Archivos mensuales: septiembre 2024

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in SFS Consulting ww.Winsure allows Code Injection.This issue affects ww.Winsure: before 4.6.2.

Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference vulnerability in SFS Consulting ww.Winsure allows XML Injection.This issue affects ww.Winsure: before 4.6.2.

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in SFS Consulting InsureE GL allows SQL Injection.This issue affects InsureE GL: before 4.6.2.

An improper access control (IDOR) vulnerability in the /api-selfportal/get-info-token-properties endpoint in MFASOFT Secure Authentication Server (SAS) 1.8.x through 1.9.x before 1.9.040924 allows remote attackers gain access to user tokens without authentication. The is a brute-force attack on the serial parameter by number identifier: GA00001, GA00002, GA00003, etc.

TOTOLINK AC1200 T8 v4.1.5cu.861_B20230220 has a buffer overflow vulnerability in the setWiFiAclRules function via the desc parameter.

TOTOLINK AC1200 T8 v4.1.5cu.861_B20230220 has a buffer overflow vulnerability in the UploadCustomModule function, which allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via the File parameter.

In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2024.1 hTML injection via the project name was possible

Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Seata. 

When developers disable authentication on the Seata-Server and do not use the Seata client SDK dependencies, they may construct uncontrolled serialized malicious requests by directly sending bytecode based on the Seata private protocol.

This issue affects Apache Seata: 2.0.0, from 1.0.0 through 1.8.0.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.1.0/1.8.1, which fixes the issue.

OMFLOW from The SYSCOM Group does not properly restrict the query range of its data query functionality, allowing remote attackers with regular privileges to obtain accounts and password hashes of other users.

OMFLOW from The SYSCOM Group does not properly restrict access to the system settings modification functionality, allowing remote attackers with regular privileges to update system settings or create accounts with administrator privileges, thereby gaining control of the server.